Paddy Waste Valorization Through Biochar Production: Enhancing Farmers' Willingness To Pay Based On Behavioral Treatment Effect

Authors

  • Syahlaa' Salsabila Putri Santoso Undergraduated Study Program of Agrotechnopreneur, School of Vocational Studies, Padjadjaran University
  • Aini Al Fatihaturrizqi Undergraduated Study Program of Agrotechnopreneur, School of Vocational Studies, Padjadjaran University
  • Reisa Sarah Rahmawati Undergraduated Study Program of Agrotechnopreneur, School of Vocational Studies, Padjadjaran University
  • Malfa Adliyah Gunawan Undergraduated Study Program of Agrotechnopreneur, School of Vocational Studies, Padjadjaran University
  • Raihan Fajar Destianto Undergraduated Study Program of Agrotechnopreneur, School of Vocational Studies, Padjadjaran University
  • Syifa Fitrianita Undergraduated Study Program of Agrotechnopreneur, School of Vocational Studies, Padjadjaran University
  • Chalisa Maula Putri Utomo Undergraduated Study Program of Agrotechnopreneur, School of Vocational Studies, Padjadjaran University
  • Bayu Rizky Pratama Agricultural and Resource Economics, Kangwon National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v6i2.1511

Keywords:

Willingness to Pay, Biochar, Carbon Credits, Contingent Valuation, Rice Farmers, Framing Treatment Effect

Abstract

Perubahan iklim telah memperparah degradasi tanah sawah, termasuk akumulasi besi fero (Fe²⁺), yang ditandai dengan air irigasi berwarna kuning kecokelatan di wilayah penelitian, dan secara langsung menekan hasil panen padi sebesar 15–30%. Biochar sebagai bahan pembenah tanah menawarkan potensi ganda dalam memitigasi toksisitas besi sekaligus berkontribusi pada penyerapan karbon, namun penilaian ekonomi petani terhadap teknologi ini masih belum banyak dieksplorasi. Akibatnya, penerapan biochar masih terbatas di kalangan petani padi skala kecil, meskipun potensinya sangat besar dalam meningkatkan kualitas tanah dan penyerapan karbon. Penelitian ini mengkaji kesediaan membayar (willingness to pay/WTP) petani padi skala kecil untuk adopsi biochar di Jawa Barat, Indonesia, menggunakan metode contingent valuation dengan format pilihan dikotomis batas ganda (double-bounded dichotomous choice). Melalui eksperimen efek pembingkaian informasi (information framing effect), 201 responden dibagi ke dalam tiga kelompok: kontrol, perlakuan informasi agronomi (T1), dan perlakuan informasi kredit karbon (T2), yang bertujuan untuk mengamati pengaruh perlakuan informasi terhadap WTP biochar di kalangan petani skala kecil. Estimasi dilakukan menggunakan regresi interval dengan robust standard error, yang divalidasi menggunakan ordered probit. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlakuan informasi secara signifikan meningkatkan WTP. Rata-rata WTP pada kelompok kontrol adalah sebesar Rp 103.994, meningkat menjadi Rp 220.502 pada perlakuan T1 dan Rp 316.034 pada perlakuan T2, yang dikonfirmasi oleh uji Wald bersama yang signifikan (χ²(2) = 14.78; p-value = 0.001). Faktor-faktor penentu utama WTP meliputi keikutsertaan dalam kelompok tani, jumlah anggota rumah tangga, kesadaran terhadap kredit karbon, dan pelatihan pertanian. Hasil ini menegaskan bahwa mengintegrasikan informasi manfaat agronomi dan kredit karbon ke dalam strategi diseminasi biochar sangat penting untuk mempercepat adopsi di kalangan petani skala kecil. Oleh karena itu, penerapan biochar di masa depan kepada petani skala kecil disarankan untuk menggabungkan kedua perlakuan informasi tersebut guna meningkatkan proses adopsi di kalangan petani skala kecil.

References

Ahmed, S.F., Ullah, H., Aung, M.Z., Tisarum, R., Cha-um, S., & Datta, A. (2023). Iron toxicity tolerance of rice genotypes in relation to growth, yield and physiochemical characteristics. Rice Science, 30(4), 321–334.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsci.2023.xx.xxx

Akahoshi, K., Zusman, E., Hanaoka, T., Thi, N., Oanh, K., Huy, L.N., Wangwongwatana, S., Homyok, P., Malley, C.S., Hirayama, T., Goto, Y., Kawashima, K., & Amann, M. (2024). The Prospects of Controlling Open Burning of Crop Residues in Thailand : A Quantitative Assessment of Implementation Barriers and Costs. Atmosphere, 15(11), 1309. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15111309

Alfnes, F., Yue, C., & Jensen, H. H. (2010). Cognitive dissonance as a means of reducing hypothetical bias. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 37(2), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbq012

Al-rabaiai, A., Menezes-blackburn, D., Al-ismaily, S., & Janke, R. (2026). Co-amendment of biochar with sulfur and compost or vermicompost improves the health and fertility of alkaline soils. Pedosphere, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedsph.2026.02.002

Ansari, A., Pranesti, A., Telaumbanua, M., Alam, T., Agustina, R., Dwi, B., & Nugroho, A. (2023). Heliyon Evaluating the effect of climate change on rice production in Indonesia using a multimodeling approach. Heliyon, 9(9), e19639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19639

Ansari, J., Mendis, S.S., Davis, M.P., Salceda-gonzalez, M., Gurmessa, B., & Udawatta, R.P. (2026). Biochar effects on soil moisture and soybean yield in claypan soils. Earth Critical Zone, 3(1), 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecz.2026.100067

Arunrat, Noppol; Sereenonchai, Sukanya; Sansupa, Chakriya; Kongsurakan, Praeploy; Hatano, R. (2023). Effect of Rice Straw and Stubble Burning on Soil Physicochemical Properties and Bacterial Communities in. Biology, 12(4), 501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12040501

Bagheri, S., Cheraghi, M., Faramarzi, F., Asgari, B., Senapathi, V., Astatkie, T., & Price, G. W. (2023). Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety Reviewing the role of biochar in paddy soils : An agricultural and environmental perspective. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 263(April), 115228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.115228

Barham, B.L., Chavas, J.-P., Fitz, D., & Schechter, L. (2015). Risk, learning, and technology adoption. Agricultural Economics, 46(1), 11–24.https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12123

Beck, M. J., Fifer, S., & Rose, J. M. (2016). Can you ever be certain? Reducing hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments via respondent reported choice certainty. Transportation Research Part B, 89, 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.004

Bezzalla, A., El, M., Bennadji, A., Zidane, L., Neffar, S., & Chenchouni, H. (2026). Biomass and Bioenergy A review on the impact of biochar applications on soil health and fertility, plant growth, and food security: advancing agricultural sustainability. Biomass and Bioenergy, 209(January), 108960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2026.108960

BPS West Java. Rice crop production (tons) 2025. Quoted from: https://jabar.bps.go.id/id/statistics-table/2/MzAxIzI=/produksi-tanaman-padi.html. Accessed on March 25, 2026.

Cameron, T. A., & Quiggin, J. (1994). Estimation using contingent valuation data from a "dichotomous choice with follow-up" questionnaire. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(3), 218–234.https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1035

Channa, H., Chen, A.Z., Pina, P., Ricker-Gilbert, J., & Stein, D. (2019). What drives smallholder farmers' willingness to pay for a new farm technology? Evidence from an experimental auction in Kenya. Food Policy, 85, 64–71.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.03.005

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Czajkowski, M., Vossler, C. A., Budziński, W., Wiśniewska, A., & Zawojska, E. (2017). Addressing empirical challenges related to the incentive compatibility of stated preference methods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 142, 47–63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.023

Das, Madhushree; Kumar, Manish; Kumar, Manoj; Biswas, K. (2025). Production of Paddy Straw Biochar for Amelioration of Coastal Saline Sandy Soil. International Journal of Bio-Resource and Stress Management, 16(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/DOI: HTTPS://DOI.ORG/10.23910/1.2025.5841

Demir, Zeynep and Bayrakli, B. (2026). Effects of Biochar on Soil Chemical, Physical, and Biochemical Properties, Silage Maize Yield, Water Productivity and Economic Returns under Drought Conditions. Pedosphere. https://doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.pedsph.2026.02.011

Ding, M., Zhou, Y., Li, Z., & Zhang, J. (2026). Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering Synergistic effect between biochar and nanoscale zero valent iron effectively mitigated nitrous oxide emissions from a flooded paddy soil. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 14(1), 120835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.120835

Evizal, R., & Prasmatiwi, FE (2023). Biochar: Utilization and practical applications. Jurnal Agrotropika, 22(1), 1–12.

Frene, J.P., Kasera, N., Jaisi, D.P., Sapkota, S., Connell, D.W.O., Higgins, S., Adhikari, S., & Ghimire, R. (2025). Science of the Total Environment Enhancing soil health and phosphorus use efficiency with modified biochar amendment. Science of the Total Environment, 1004(October), 180794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180794

Frimpong, KA, Abbey, ANA, Ampofo, EA, Abubakari, FV, Manso, E., Odoi-Yorke, F., et al. (2026). Evaluating the socio-economic impacts of biochar initiatives on sustainable livelihoods among smallholder farmers. Discover Agriculture, 4, 150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44279-026-00633-0

Genius, M., Koundouri, P., Nauges, C., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2014). Information transmission in irrigation technology adoption and diffusion: Social learning, extension services, and spatial effects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(1), 328–344.https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat054

Genius, M., Koundouri, P., Nauges, C., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2014). Information transmission in irrigation technology adoption and diffusion: Social learning, extension services, and spatial effects. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96(1), 328–344. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aat054

Haghani, M., Bliemer, MCJ, Rose, J.M., Oppewal, H., & Lancsar, E. (2021). Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments : Part II . Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods. Journal of Choice Modelling, 41(August), 100322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100322

Hanemann, M., Loomis, J., & Kanninen, B. (1991). Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73(4), 1255–1263.https://doi.org/10.2307/1242453

Hanemann, W. M. (1984). Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3), 332–341.https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800

Hu, J., Yang, S., Cornelis, W.M., Huang, Q., Qi, S., & Jiang, Z. (2025). Biochar amendment mitigates negative effects of controlled irrigation on paddy soil structure : Insights from micro-pore network analysis. Agricultural Water Management, 314(109517). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109517

Iturbe-espinoza, P., Elsgaard, L., Sapkota, R., Ellegaard-jensen, L., & Winding, A. (2026). Eight-year effect of biochar amendment on soil properties, extracellular enzyme activity, N-cycling genes and microbiome structure in two Danish fallow soils. Microbiological Research, 303(October 2025), 128398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2025.128398

Janiszewska-Latterini, D., Ortigueira, J., Lopes, T.F., Gościańska-Łowińska, J., Augustyniak-Wysocka, D., Leszczyszyn, E., & Nobre, C. (2025). Social Awareness as a Catalyst for Biochar Adoption in the Agricultural and Forestry Sectors. GCB Bioenergy, 17(10), e70077. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.70077

Jiang, Z., Yang, S., Pang, Q., Abdalla, M., Qi, S., Hu, J., Qiu, H., & Smith, P. (2025). Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Optimizing biochar application rate and predicting of climate change impacts on net greenhouse gas emissions in paddy systems using DNDC-BC model. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 364(January), 110461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110461

Kapoor, S., Bishist, R., Sharma, P., Prakash, P., & Chauhan, A. (2026). Biomass and Bioenergy Integrating bamboo-derived biochar into Morus-based agroforestry for improved soil fertility, crop productivity and environmental sustainability in the North-Western Himalayas. Biomass and Bioenergy, 212(March), 109295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2026.109295

Knowler, D., & Bradshaw, B. (2007). Farmers' adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy, 32(1), 25–48.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2006.01.003

Kong, D., Zhang, X., Li, B., Zhu, G., Liu, M., & Liu, S. (2026). Soil & Tillage Research Biochar-based fertilizer mitigates paddy soil N 2 O emissions by shifting nitrifier-denitrifier functional gene balance and enhancing recovery efficiency of nitrogen. Soil & Tillage Research, 261(August 2025), 107176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2026.107176

Kumar, A., Kumar, K., & Singh, S. (2019). Environmental Technology & Innovation Effect of paddy straw burning on soil microbial dynamics in sandy loam soil of Indo-Gangetic plains. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 16, 100469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2019.100469

Latawiec, A.E., Kr., J.B., & Kubo, M. (2017). Willingness to Adopt Biochar in Agriculture : The Producer's Perspective. Sustainability, 9(4), 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040655

Latawiec, A.E., Królczyk, J.B., Kuboń, M., Szwedziak, K., Drosik, A., Polańczyk, E., Grotkiewicz, K., & Strassburg, BBN (2017). Willingness to adopt biochar in agriculture: The producer's perspective. Sustainability, 9(4), 655. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040655

Liang, D., Ning, Y., Ji, C., Zhang, Y., Wu, H., & Ma, H. (2024). Biochar and Manure Co-Application Increases Rice Yield in Low Productive Acid Soil by Increasing Soil pH, Organic Carbon, and Nutrient Retention and Availability. Plants, 13(7), 973. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.3390/plants13070973

Lopez-Feldman, A. (2012). Introduction to contingent valuation using Stata (MPRA Paper No. 41018). Munich Personal RePEc Archive.https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/41018/

Lu, H., Li, K., Shi, Y., Nkoh, J., & Hong, Z. (2025). Combining biochar and lime amendments for remediation of Cd-contaminated paddy soil around e-waste dismantling site : a study from laboratory to field. Journal of Environmental Management, 394(September), 127490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.127490

Lusk, J. L. (2003). Effects of Cheap Talk on Consumer Willingness-to-Pay for Golden Rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 840–856. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00492Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Lusk, J. L. (2003). Effects of cheap talk on consumer willingness-to-pay for golden rice. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(4), 840–856.https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00492

Ma, S., Swinton, S. M., Lupi, F., & Jolejole-Foreman, C. (2012). Farmers' willingness to participate in payment-for-environmental-services programs. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63(3), 604–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2012.00358.x

Mariano, M. J., Villano, R., & Fleming, E. (2012). Factors influencing farmers' adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines. Agricultural Systems, 110, 41–53.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.010

Moragues-saitua, L., Arias-gonzález, A., & Blanco, F. (2023). Effects of biochar and wood ash amendments in the soil-water-plant environment of two temperate forest plantations. Front. For. Globe. Change, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.878217

Murphy, J. J., & Stevens, T. H. (2005). Is Cheap Talk Effective at Eliminating Hypothetical Bias in a Provision Point Mechanism? Environmental and Resource Economics, 30, 327–343. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1007/s10640-004-4224-y

Mutz, D. C. (2011). Population-based survey experiments. Princeton University Press.https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840489

Naa, A., Abbey, A., Agyei, K., Odoi-yorke, F., Akwasi, E., & Opoku, R. (2025). A review of biochar's sustainability in climate-smart agriculture: Recent advances, emerging trends, and future directions. European Journal of Agronomy, 169(March), 127690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127690

Nan, Q., Chi, W., Yang, X., Li, S., Qin, Y., & Wang, L. (2025). Long-term impacts of straw and biochar applications on microbial diversity and soil functions in paddy soils ☆. Environmental Pollution, 384(July), 126943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.126943

Nisa, K., Siringo-ringo, L., & Muyassir, Z. (2019). The Utilization of Agricultural Waste Biochar and Straw Compost Fertilizer on Paddy Plant Growth. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 506(012061). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/506/1/012061

Noltze, M., Schwarze, S., & Qaim, M. (2012). Understanding the adoption of system technologies in smallholder agriculture: The system of rice intensification (SRI) in Timor Leste. Agricultural Systems, 108, 64–73.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.01.003

Olum, S., Gellynck, X., Juvinal, J., Ongeng, D., & De Steur, H. (2020). Farmers' adoption of agricultural innovations: A systematic review on willingness to pay studies. Outlook on Agriculture, 49(3), 187–203.https://doi.org/10.1177/0030727019879453

Paiman; Effendy, I. (2020). The effect of soil water content and biochar on rice cultivation in polybags. Open Agriculture, 5, 117–125. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2020-0012

Perrone, M., Ruggeri, G., Tosca, A., & Verga, E. (2025). Exploring behavioral intentions behind biochar technology adoption in agriculture. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 61(July), 66–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2025.10.009

Ploll, U., Weingarten, N., & Hartmann, M. (2023). Frame by frame, attitude by attitude – The effect of information framing in videos on consumers' acceptance of sustainable food production innovations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 92(April), 102185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102185

Ren, J., Ren, X., Deng, Z., Zhang, H., & Wang, J. (2025). Bioresource Technology Ecological effects of biochar in heavy metal-contaminated soils from multidimensional perspective : Using meta-analysis. Bioresource Technology, 432(February), 132695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2025.132695

Rodríguez, J.M., Molnar, J.J., Fazio, R.A., Sydnor, E., & Lowe, M.J. (2017). Understanding the role of social capital in adoption decisions: An application to irrigation technology. Agricultural Systems, 153, 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.02.002

Rink, A., Chen, T., Walsh, N., Larina, K., Sherpa, R., & Höglund, R. (2024, April 30). Durable CDR market update Q1 2024: Biochar takes center stage. CDR.fyi.https://www.cdr.fyi/blog/2024-q1-durable-cdr-market-update-blossoming-biochar

Salma, A., Fryda, L., & Djelal, H. (2024). Biochar: A Key Player in Carbon Credits and Climate Mitigation. Resources, 13(31). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/resources13020031

Shogren, J. F., Jacquemet, N., & Joule, R. (2013). Preference elicitation under oath. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65, 110–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.05.004

Singh, S., Chaturvedi, S., Nayak, P., Chandra, V., Manoj, T., Nandipamu, K., Kumar, D., Gudapaty, P., Mathyam, P., Srinivasrao, K., & Govindaraju, K. (2023). Science of the Total Environment Carbon offset potential of biochar based straw management under rice-wheat system along Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Science of the Total Environment, 897(June), 165176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165176

Sriphirom, P., Chidthaisong, A., Yagi, K., Boonapatcharoen, N., & Towprayoon, S. (2021). Effects of biochar on methane emissions, grain yield, and soil in rice cultivation in Thailand. Carbon Management, 12(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2021.1885257

Stevens, T.H., Tabatabaei, M., & Lass, D. (2013). Oaths and hypothetical bias. Journal of Environmental Management, 127, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.038

Streletskaya, N.A., Bell, S.D., Kecinski, M., Li, T., Banerjee, S., & Palm-forster, L.H. (2020). Agricultural Adoption and Behavioral Economics: Bridging the Gap. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 00(00), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13006

Teklewold, H., Kassie, M., & Shiferaw, B. (2013). Adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(3), 597–623.https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12011

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453–458.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683

Veettil, P. C., & Scientist, S. (2025). Hypothetical bias and cognitive ability : Farmers' preference for crop insurance products †. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 107(3), 888–924. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajae.12506

Verra Registry. 2024. Verra Registers first biochar project. Retrieved from: https://verra.org/verra-registers-first-biochar-project/. Accessed March 20, 2026.

Wang, H., Dong, W., Shao, D., Liu, L., Liao, B., Gu, W., Tang, C., Liu, J., Hu, W., Feng, J., & Huang, J. (2024). Biochar Enhances Paddy Productivity, Carbon Sequestration, and Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Middle Yangtze River Region. Agronomy, 14(23), 1–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14123067

Wu, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, L., Zheng, Y., Liu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023). The critical role of biochar to mitigate the adverse impacts of drought and salinity stress in plants. Front. Plant Sci, 14(1163451), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1163451

Xhakollari, V., Asioli, D., & Nayga, R. M. (2025). Mitigating hypothetical bias in choice Experiments : An in-depth review on the use of cheap talk. Journal of Choice Modeling, 56(October 2024), 100561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2025.100561

Zhao, X., & Grossart, H. (2024). European Journal of Soil Biology Enhancing crop yield and microbial diversity in saline-affected paddy soil through biochar amendment under aquaculture wastewater irrigation. European Journal of Soil Biology, 123(March), 103681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2024.103681

Zheng, Y., Han, X., Li, Y., Yang, J., Li, N., & An, N. (2019). Effects of Biochar and Straw Application on the Physicochemical and Biological Properties of Paddy Soils in Northeast China. Nature Scientific Reports, 9(16531), 1–11.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52978-w

Zou, J., Li, Y., & Qi, W. (2025). Green information framing effects on farmers' willingness for sustainable production in China. Discover Sustainability, 6(719).https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-025-01653-4

Downloads

Published

2026-08-14

How to Cite

Santoso, S. S. P., Al Fatihaturrizqi, A. ., Rahmawati, R. S. ., Gunawan, M. A. ., Destianto, R. F. ., Fitrianita, S. ., Putri Utomo, C. M. ., & Pratama, B. R. . (2026). Paddy Waste Valorization Through Biochar Production: Enhancing Farmers’ Willingness To Pay Based On Behavioral Treatment Effect. Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v6i2.1511