Integrating Challenge-Based Learning in Arts and Design Research Classes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53866/ijcar.v3i1.638Keywords:
Arts, Design research , Challenge-based learning, Students , PhilippinesAbstract
This study explored the integration of challenge-based learning (CBL) in Arts and Design research classes. Pre-test and post-test assessments and a satisfaction survey were collected to determine its effectiveness with an average score of 23.15 to 28.27 out of 40 items showing an improvement in their research skills after the implementation. Satisfaction with CBL varied resulting in a mean score of 2.77 which corresponds that learners are satisfied with the intervention. These findings displayed that CBL can enhance research skills, especially in arts and design research classes. The data presented that the respondents improved their scores in the post-test. While in another survey, respondents were satisfied with the intervention of using CBL in their classes. This intervention is effective, as evidenced by improved test scores which determine the effectiveness of the used instructional methods. Improvements in some aspects of satisfaction can be made especially on the lecture quality, which suggests that future instructors must create more interactive and engaging research teaching methods to enhance learning outcomes and participant satisfaction. Therefore, this study displays how innovative instructional strategies and the importance of ongoing evaluation and refinement will ensure that educational practices meet learners' needs. The study concludes that CBL can be used by educators and policymakers to improve research education in arts and design research classes.
References
Dilmaç, S. (2020). Students’ Opinions about the Distance Education to Art and Design Courses in the Pandemic Process. World Journal of Education, 10(3), 113. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v10n3p113
Hsu, H. C., & Hsu, H. L. (2020). Action Research for Using Problem-Based Learning in Adult Education. Proceedings of the 2020 6th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201214.094
Leijon, M., Gudmundsson, P., Staaf, P., & Christersson, C. (2021). Challenge-based learning in higher education– A systematic literature review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(5), 609–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2021.1892503
Nichols, M., & Cator, K(2008). Challenge-Based Learning White Paper. Cupertino, California: Apple, Inc
Prado, N. I. (2020). Impact of Accreditation on the Quality of Academic Programs in a Private Higher Education Institution. Liceo Journal of Higher Education Research, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.7828/ljher.v16i1.1367
Sukackė, V., De Carvalho Guerra, A. O. P., Ellinger, D., Carlos, V., Petronienė, S., Gaižiūnienė, L., Blanch, S., Marbà-Tallada, A., & Brose, A. (2022). Towards Active Evidence-Based Learning in Engineering Education: A Systematic Literature Review of PBL, PjBL, and CBL. Sustainability, 14(21), 13955. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113955
Taconis, R., & Bekker, T. (2023). Challenge Based Learning as authentic learning environment for STEM identity construction. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1144702
Yulianto,T., Pramudya,I. & Slamet,I. (2019). Effects of the 21st century learning model and problem-based models on higher order thinking skill. International Journal of Educational Research Review,4(4),644-650.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 John Arvin A. Glo

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


















