Kit and Worksheet Construction for Isolation Graphene Experiment Based on Guided Inquiry Learning to Improving High School Students View Nature of Science and Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53866/ijcar.v2i2.561Keywords:
Guided Inquiry Learning, VNOST Skills, Kit and Worksheet, High School StudentsAbstract
This research is based on the findings of the 2000-2015 PISA study which shows the low literacy skills of Indonesian students. Learning in schools that focuses too much on content is a major problem. This research seeks to improve by strengthening students' understanding of the nature of science (NOS) and technology (NOT) through technoscience activities, which are expected to increase students' understanding of the nature of science and technology (VNOST). Specifically, this research was carried out to construct a guided inquiry practical kit and worksheet for ionic liquid-based graphene isolation for students. The results of the curriculum suitability analysis and the results of the optimization of ionic liquid-based graphene isolation procedures are in accordance with the stages in the Model of Educational Reconstruction (MER) design research method. Based on the results of a study of graphene technology literature, it was found that the basic ideas of knowledge about graphene technology are in accordance with school chemistry concepts and can be used as an interesting, potential and applicable chemistry learning context or theme and are in accordance with the content of the revised 2013 curriculum. These findings are constructed in such a way as to produce worksheets that are appropriate to students' ability levels, integrated with VNOST, and applicable in accordance with contemporary developments in science and technology. Results indicated significant improvements in VNOST skills, with students demonstrating better understanding and application of scientific concepts.
References
Arifin, M. dkk. (2000). Strategi belajar mengajar kimia. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Kimia FPMIPA UPI.
Cividanes, L.D. & Thim, G.P. (2016). Functionalizing graphene and carbon nanotube : A review. Springer Journal.1(1), hlm 1-15.
Depdiknas. (2007). Panduan pengembangan pembelajaran IPA terpadu. Dirjen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Umum.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2004). Pedoman umum pengembangan bahan ajar sekolah menengah atas. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, Direktorat Pendidikan menengah umum.
Duit, R. (2007). Science education research internationally: Conceptions, research methods, domains of research. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(1), hlm 3–15.
Duit, R. dkk. (2012). The model of educational reconstruction - a framework for improving teaching and learning science. In D. Jorde & J. Dillon (Eds.), Science Education Research and Practice in Europe: Retrospective and Prospective. hlm 13–37.
Eggen, P.D. & Kauchak, P.P. (1996). Strategies for teacher : teaching content and thingking skill. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Firman, H. (2007). Laporan analisis literasi sains berdasarkan Hasil PISA Nasional Tahun 2006. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Depdiknas.
Gardner, P. (1999) The representation of science–technology relationships in Canadian physics textbooks International Journal of Science Education, 21, hlm 329–347.
Graber, W. dkk. (2001). Scientific literacy : from theory to practice. Research in Science Education–Past, Present, and Future. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, hlm 61-70.
Hayat, & Yusuf. (2010). Mutu pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Hofstein, A., Navon, O., Kipnis,H., & R.Mamloko-Naaman. (2005). Developing students ability to ask more and better question resulting inquiry type chemistry laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (7), hlm 791-806.
Keenan, dkk. (1984). Kimia untuk universitas. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Kemendikbud. (2016). Lampiran : Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan nomor 21 tahun 2016. Jakarta : Kementrian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
McComas, W. (2002). A textbook case of the nature of science: Laws and theories in the science of biology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, I(2), hlm 141-155.
OEDC. (2015). PISA 2015 results in focus. OEDC Publishing.
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Results volume I : Excellence and equity in education. OEDC Publishing.
Rubba, P., & Harkness, W. (1993). Examination of pre-service and in-service science teachers beliefs about science–technology–society interactions, Science Education, 77, hlm 407–431.
Rustaman, dkk. (2003). Strategi belajar mengajar Biologi. Common Textbook FPMIPA UPI.
Suhendi, E. (2011). Graphene dan aplikasinya pada divais elektonika. Prosiding seminar nasional sains dan teknologi nuklir PTNBR-BATAN. Bandung
Sun, Z., dkk. (2011). Graphene Chemistry : Synthesis and manipulation. The journal Physical Chemistry Letters, hlm 2525-2432.
Tairab, H.H. (2001). How do pre-service and in-service science teachers view the nature of science and technology?. Research in Science & Technology Education, 19(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Haris Gozali, Ahmad Mudzakir, Mulyati Arifin, R Tiara Permatasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
