Strategi Komunikasi Dalam Advokasi Kebijakan Pengendalian Tembakau (Studi Kasus Lentera Anak)
Communication Strategies in Tobacco Control Policy Advocacy (Case Study: Lentera Anak)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v6i1.989Keywords:
Strategic Communication, Policy Advocacy, Tobacco Control, Lentera Anak, Child ProtectionAbstract
Tobacco control in Indonesia faces multidimensional challenges, primarily driven by the high prevalence of smokers among children and adolescents, weak regulatory frameworks for health protection, and aggressive interference from the tobacco industry. The industry systematically manipulates public narratives, linking tobacco consumption to state revenue and the welfare of tobacco farmers to hinder stricter regulations. In this context, the Lentera Anak Foundation, a civil society organization focused on child protection, has positioned itself as a leading advocate in promoting stronger and more comprehensive tobacco control policies. This research employs a qualitative case study method to analyze the communication strategies utilized by Lentera Anak in advocating for the revision of Government Regulation Number 109 of 2012. The primary objective is to examine the strategic communication methods employed, such as public campaigns, high-level advocacy targeting policymakers, social media utilization, and grassroots mobilization. Furthermore, the study identifies supporting and hindering factors, particularly industry lobbying and public apathy, while evaluating the effectiveness of these strategies in influencing public policy and protecting children from tobacco exposure. The findings highlight the critical importance of interpersonal and community-based communication, the construction of strong counter-narratives to challenge industry propaganda, and multi-stakeholder engagement, including active youth participation and collaboration with relevant ministries. The study concludes that a consistent, evidence-based, and inclusive communication strategy is essential to maintaining public awareness, advancing policy reform, and ensuring the long-term protection of children from the pervasive influence of the tobacco industry in Indonesia.
References
Aacharya, H. (2022). CONTENT ANALYSIS. IPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD), 7(4). https://doi.org/10.36713/epra2016
Assunta, M. (n.d.). Global Tobacco Industry Interference Index 2023. Retrieved from www.globaltobaccoindex.org
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Brilian Dewanta, A. (2022). Kesetiaan Palsu: Eksploitasi Petani Tembakau di Temanggung. Lembaran Antropologi, 1(2), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.22146/LA.4274
Cleland, J., MacLeod, A., & Ellaway, R. H. (2021). The curious case of case study research. Medical Education, 55(10), 1131–1141. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.14544
Deny, S. (2023, December 5). Data Kemenperin: Industri Hasil Tembakau Serap 5,9 Juta Tenaga Kerja, Setor Cukai Rp218 Triliun. Retrieved May 22, 2025, from merdeka.com website: https://www.merdeka.com/uang/data-kemenperin-industri-hasil-tembakau-serap-59-juta-tenaga-kerja-setor-cukai-rp218-triliun-57907-mvk.html?page=2
FAO. (2022). The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2022. https://doi.org/10.4060/CC0639EN
Grehenson, G. (2023, October 11). Kesejahteraan Petani Tembakau Tidak Sebanding dengan Kenaikan Pendapatan Negara dari Cukai Rokok. Retrieved May 22, 2025, from Universitas Gadjah Mada website: https://ugm.ac.id/id/berita/kesejahteraan-petani-tembakau-tidak-sebanding-dengan-kenaikan-pendapatan-negara-dari-cukai-rokok/
Hariani, A. (2024, January 11). CISDI: Biaya Pengobatan Akibat Rokok Rp 27,7 T, Pengenaan Pajak Rokok Elektrik 10 Persen Tepat. Retrieved May 22, 2025, from pajak.com website: https://www.pajak.com/pajak/cisdi-biaya-pengobatan-akibat-rokok-rp-277-t-pengenaan-pajak-rokok-elektrik-10-persen-tepat/
Husnullail, M., Risnita, Jailani, M. S., & Asbui. (2024). TEKNIK PEMERIKSAAN KEABSAHAN DATA DALAM RISET ILMIAH. Jurnal Genta Mulia, 15(2), 70–78. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uncm.ac.id/index.php/gm/article/view/1148
Kementerian Kesehatan. (2024). Survei Kesehatan Indonesia (SKI) 2023. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://repository.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/id/eprint/5539/1/
Kementerian Pertanian. (2024). OUTLOOK TEMBAKAU 2024. Jakarta.
Nua, F. (2024, October 19). Capai Rp213 Triliun, Sumbangan Industri Rokok Lebih Besar dari BUMN. Retrieved May 22, 2025, from metrotvnews.com website: https://www.metrotvnews.com/read/KRXC5ojQ-capai-rp213-triliun-sumbangan-industri-rokok-lebih-besar-dari-bumn
Prabawati, L. P., & Nurhidayah, S. (2024). Problematika Rokok di Indonesia: Pemetaan Masalah dan Prediksi Kebijakan Pengendalian Konsumsi Rokok Kalangan Remaja. Jurnal Paradigma: Jurnal Multidisipliner Mahasiswa Pascasarjana Indonesia, 5(1), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.22146/JPMMPI.V5I1.91962
Rezeki, S., & Utari, D. M. (2021). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Perilaku Merokok Pada Anak Sekolah Dasar di SD Pinggiran Banda AcehTahun 2021 (Affecting Factors Smoking Behavior in Suburban Elementary School of Children at Banda Aceh in 2021). In Journal of Healthcare Technology and Medicine (Vol. 7).
Sugiyo, D., & Sutrisno, R. Y. (2021). Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Melindungi Pelajar Sekolah dari Iklan, Promosi, dan Sponsor Tembakau. Journal of Community Engagement in Health, 4(1), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.30994/JCEH.V4I1.98
Sutha, D. W., Christine, C., Prihartanti, N. G., & Kartika, R. C. (2024). SEKOLAH DASAR BEBAS ASAP ROKOK: MENCIPTAKAN LINGKUNGAN SEHAT DAN RAMAH ANAK. Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 7(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.24198/kumawula.v7i1.50461
Tobacco Atlas. (2023, October 26). Teenage Smoking Statistics: Youth Tobacco Use. Retrieved May 17, 2025, from Tobacco Atlas website: https://tobaccoatlas.org/challenges/youth/
Ward, K. D., Mason, D. P., Park, G., & Fyall, R. (2023). Exploring Nonprofit Advocacy Research Methods and Design: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(5), 1210–1231. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221131747
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Anatasia Wahyudi, Olvi Vania, Selena Dennysal, Diane Derlin, Qonitha Risky

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

















