LSTM Regression Models for Real-Time Earthquake Source Localization From Single Station
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v5i3.913Keywords:
LSTM, machine learning, seismologyAbstract
Real-time earthquake source localization plays a vital role in Earthquake Early Warning (EEW) systems, yet remains a significant challenge, especially in regions with sparse seismic station coverage. This study explores the potential of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for estimating source-to-station distance and hypocentral depth from single-station three-component waveform data. We utilize the Stanford Earthquake Dataset (STEAD) and apply a rigorous preprocessing pipeline to extract a clean subset of over 100,000 labeled seismic event waveforms, ensuring completeness and consistency. We develop and tune three LSTM-based regression models using the Hyperband optimization algorithm. The best-performing model achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 26.1 km for distance and 10.1 km for depth. While these results are less accurate than those of baseline models based on Temporal Convolutional Networks and deep CNNs, our approach emphasizes architectural simplicity and operational efficiency. All LSTM models maintain a low number of parameters (as few as 6,098) and exhibit fast inference speeds under 60 ms on a standard GTX 1080 GPU with an Intel i7-7700K CPU. These findings suggest that LSTM-based architectures provide a promising lightweight alternative for rapid deployment in EEW systems, especially in low-resource or single-station scenarios. Future work will explore hybrid neural architectures and attention mechanisms to improve localization performance while maintaining real-time feasibility.
References
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/NECO.1997.9.8.1735
Li, L., Jamieson, K., DeSalvo, G., Rostamizadeh, A., & Talwalkar, A. (2018). Hyperband: A Novel Bandit-Based Approach to Hyperparameter Optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 18(185), 1–52. http://jmlr.org/papers/v18/16-558.html
Lomax, A., Michelini, A., & Curtis, A. (2014). Earthquake Location, Direct, Global-Search Methods. Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27737-5_150-2
Mousavi, S. M., & Beroza, G. C. (2020). Bayesian-Deep-Learning Estimation of Earthquake Location from Single-Station Observations. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(11), 8211–8224. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2020.2988770
Mousavi, S. M., & Beroza, G. C. (2023). Machine Learning in Earthquake Seismology. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 51(Volume 51, 2023), 105–129. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-EARTH-071822-100323/CITE/REFWORKS
Mousavi, S. M., Ellsworth, W. L., Zhu, W., Chuang, L. Y., & Beroza, G. C. (2020). Earthquake transformer—an attentive deep-learning model for simultaneous earthquake detection and phase picking. Nature Communications 2020 11:1, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17591-w
Mousavi, S. M., Sheng, Y., Zhu, W., & Beroza, G. C. (2019). STanford EArthquake Dataset (STEAD): A Global Data Set of Seismic Signals for AI. IEEE Access, 7, 179464–179476. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947848
Perol, T., Gharbi, M., & Denolle, M. (2018). Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location. Science Advances, 4(2), 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700578
Ristea, N. C., & Radoi, A. (2022). Complex Neural Networks for Estimating Epicentral Distance, Depth, and Magnitude of Seismic Waves. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 19. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2021.3059422
Ross, Z. E., Meier, M. A., Hauksson, E., & Heaton, T. H. (2018). Generalized Seismic Phase Detection with Deep Learning. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 108(5A), 2894–2901. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120180080
Thurber, C. H., & Rabinowitz, N. (Eds.). (2000). Advances in Seismic Event Location. 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9536-0
Zhu, W., & Beroza, G. C. (2019). PhaseNet: a deep-neural-network-based seismic arrival-time picking method. Geophysical Journal International, 216(1), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/GJI/GGY423
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Achmad Indra Aulia, Trio Adiono, Carmadi Machbub, Sri Widiyantoro

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

















