PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN INDONESIA'S DEFENSE POLICY: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR BUILDING NATIONAL TRUST
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v4i4.642Keywords:
accountability, defense policy, public participation, transparency, trust-buildingAbstract
Public participation is a vital aspect of democratic governance, promoting transparency, accountability, and trust between governments and citizens. In Indonesia, public engagement in defense policymaking has been limited, often hindered by bureaucratic rigidity, lack of transparency, and societal perceptions that defense is an elite domain. This study explores the challenges and opportunities for fostering public participation in defense policymaking, focusing on its potential to strengthen trust and enhance policy legitimacy. Using a qualitative approach with secondary data, the research analyzes policy documents, government reports, and scholarly literature to uncover key patterns and insights. The findings highlight significant barriers, such as hierarchical bureaucratic structures, restricted access to information, and a general lack of public connection to defense issues. However, the study also identifies promising opportunities to enhance engagement, including leveraging digital platforms to reach a broader audience, collaborating with civil society and academic institutions, and adopting participatory governance models. Successful examples, such as community-driven disaster preparedness programs and participatory budgeting initiatives, illustrate the potential of inclusive approaches to build trust and improve policy outcomes. The study concludes that meaningful public participation is essential for ensuring defense policies align with societal needs and foster public trust. Addressing structural barriers and institutionalizing participatory mechanisms are key steps toward achieving this goal. These findings contribute to the growing discourse on participatory governance and provide practical recommendations for enhancing collaboration and inclusivity in defense policymaking.
Keywords: accountability, defense policy, public participation, transparency, trust-building
References
Antara. (2024, August 24). Indonesia’s Defense University meets global standards, says Prabowo. Antara News. https://en.antaranews.com/news/323527/indonesias-defense-university-meets-global-standards-says-prabowo
Arif, A., Kristiyanto, A., Seftyono, C., Anantanyu, S., Saptaningtyas, H., Juego, B., & Widayat, T. (2024). Participatory Budgeting in Surakarta, Indonesia: Pro-Poor Approach. Journal of Government and Civil Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31000/jgcs.v8i2.11155
Arnstein, S. R. (2007). A LADDER OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
BNPB. (2024). Informasi Laporan Tahunan Layanan Publik. BNPB. https://web.bnpb.go.id/ppid/informasi/informasi-layanan-tahunan
Braithwaite, V., & Levi, M. (1998). Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=7uWFAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR9&dq=2.%09Braithwaite,+V.,+%26+Levi,+M.+(1998).+Trust+and+Governance.+Russell+Sage+Foundation&ots=ZfA0tNYtTO&sig=A2Fw2EmDOgD_YTvgN9wNcGGbFTc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
BSSN. (2022, March 29). Laporan Tahunan Monitoring Keamanan Siber Tahun 2021. BSSN. https://www.bssn.go.id/laporan-tahunan-monitoring-keamanan-siber-tahun-2021/
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. https://cumming.ucalgary.ca/sites/default/files/teams/82/communications/Creswell%202003%20-%20Research%20Design%20-%20Qualitative%2C%20Quantitative%20and%20Mixed%20Methods.pdf
Crouch, H. A. (2007). The army and politics in Indonesia. Equinox Publishing. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=en&lr=&id=TJptHWc4i1EC&oi=fnd&pg=PA7&dq=3.%09Crouch,+H.+(1978).+The+Army+and+Politics+in+Indonesia.+Ithaca:+Cornell+University+Press&ots=N2LBZ42ypu&sig=FoZ9zjqCHM7bd8Qjr79KZbqqPAk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Fukuyama, F. (2011). The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gisselquist, R. M. (2012). Good governance as a concept, and why this matters for development policy (Issue 2012/30). WIDER Working Paper.
Goede, M. (2019). E-Estonia: The e-government cases of Estonia, Singapore, and Curaҫao. Archives of Business Research, 7, 216–227. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.72.6174
Gultom, S., Ahmad, I., Arifin, A., Suhardono, E., & Yacobus, D. (2022). Civil-Military Relation in the Land Border: A Case Study of West Kalimantan. https://resmilitaris.net/uploads/paper/9a1b1c1bef92ebbc878fbb32d962d183.pdf
Gunawan, A. B. (2017). Civilian Control and Defense Policy in Indonesia’s Nascent Democracy. In A. Croissant & D. Kuehn (Eds.), Reforming Civil-Military Relations in New Democracies: Democratic Control and Military Effectiveness in Comparative Perspectives (pp. 129–150). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53189-2_7
Haripin, M. (2020). Civil-Military Relations in Indonesia The Politics of Military Operations Other Than War. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Civil-Military-Relations-in-Indonesia-The-Politics-of-Military-Operations-Other-Than-War/Haripin/p/book/9781032089829
Indonesian Ministry of Defense. (2021). Annual Report on National Defense and Security. Ministry of Defense.
Izzati, N. R. (2015). Increasing The Role of Civil Society through LAPOR!: National Complaint Handling System in Indonesia. 17th International Conference on Law, Policing, and Justice, 28–29. https://123dok.com/document/z12mm1vy-increasing-civil-society-lapor-national-complaint-handling-indonesia.html
Juneau, T., & Lagassé, P. (2020). Bridging the academic‐policy gap in Canadian defence: What more can be done? Canadian Public Administration, 63(2), 206–228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12365
Kenkel, K. M. (2006). Civil Society Participation in Defence Policy. http://www.jofssm.org/issues/jofssm_Kenkel_civil_society.doc
Ministry of Defense of the Republic of Indonesia. (2015). DEFENCE MINISTRY OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA. https://www.kemhan.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/2015-INDONESIA-DEFENCE-WHITE-PAPER-ENGLISH-VERSION.pdf
Pratama, A. Y., & Sariffuddin, S. (2018). Community-Based Disaster Management: A Lesson Learned from Community Emergency Response Management in Banyumas, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 123(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/123/1/012003
Rainie, L., Smith, A., Schlozman, K. L., Brady, H., & Verba, S. (2019, October 19). Social Media and Political Engagement. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2012/10/19/social-media-and-political-engagement/
Rusmini, R., Delarnoor, N., Yuningsih, N., & Sagita, N. (2024). E-Goverment and Public Services in Indonesia: Prospects and Challenges. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i7.15507
Sarjito, A. (2023). Defense Policy Roadmap Towards a Golden Indonesia 2045: Establishment of the Indonesian Space Armed Forces. Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 3, 188–197. https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v3i3.403
Sudirman, A., & Rachmat Nugraha, T. (2024). Space security in Indo-Pacific: an Indonesian perspective. Asian Security, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14799855.2024.2431964
Transparency International. (2020). Government Defence Integrity Index (GDI). Transparency International. https://ti-defence.org/what-we-do/responsible-defence-governance/government-defence-integrity-index-gdi/
Verma, R. (2024). CYBERSECURITY CHALLENGES IN THE ERA OF DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION (p. 187). https://doi.org/10.25215/9392917848.20
World Bank. (2023). Digital Progress and Trends Report 2023. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/digital-progress-and-trends-report
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications. Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Aris Sarjito

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

















