Simulasi Perbandingan Perubahan TILT Terhadap Energi Array Pada 34 Unit Plts Rooftop 100 kwp di Indonesia

Authors

  • Hero Gunawan Universitas Indonesia
  • Budi Sudiarto Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v2i1.27

Keywords:

GSA, PLTS Rooftop, Tilt, and Energy Array

Abstract

One of the activities to developing the use of rooftop solar panels in Indonesia in accordance with the mandate of RUEN is the mandatory use of solar cells at a minimum of 30% of the roof area for all government buildings. In this regard, good planning related to engineering is needed, one of which is the orientation and tilt aspects used. In International, to assist countries in achieving sustainable development goals for new and renewable energy, the World Bank Group partnered with Solargis, releasing a web-based application called Global Solar Atlas (GSA) with optimum tilt and energy arrays as research references. From this study, it was found that tilt changes greatly affect the resulting array energy, an average change of 10 from 00-160 can result in changes in addition of up to 578 kWh and reduction of up to 483 kWh. The largest array energy potential value is located in the province of Bali at 16.5872 kWh and the smallest in West Kalimantan at 12.1924 kWh., while compared to the modeling in the GSA application, the largest array energy value is in NTT with a value of 16.5673 kWh and the smallest is in East Kalimantan with rated 12.1843 kWh. The tilt value in Indonesia from 34 simulated locations is at 00-130 and is still in the tilt range in Indonesia according to the GSA application, which is 00-140.

References

Peraturan Presiden Nomor 22 Tahun 2017 tentang Rencana Umum Energi Nasional

Keputusan Menteri ESDM Nomor: 188.K/HK.02/MEM.L/2021 Tentang Pengesahan Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik PT Perusahaan Listrik Negara (Persero) Tahun 2021 sampai dengan 2030

Rencana Strategis Direktorat Jenderal Energi Baru, Terbarukan dan Konservasi Energi 2020-2024. Ditjen EBTKE. Jakarta. 2020

Laporan Kinerja Ditjen EBTKE Tahun 2020. Ditjen EBTKE. Jakarta. 2020

Eriko Arvin Karuniawan. (2021). Analis Perangkat Lunak PVSYST, PVSOL dan HelioScope dalam Simulasi Fixed Tilt Photovoltaic. Jurnal Teknologi Elektro Vol. 12. No.3 p-ISSN: 2086‐9479 e-ISSN: 2621-8534, DOI: 10.22441/jte.2021.v12i3.001.

Aditya Rachamn. (2015). Optimalisasi Teknologi Energi Surya Berbasis Penyesuaian Posisi Panel Bulanan di Sulawesi Tenggara. Jurnal Teknologi Universitas Muhamadiyah Jakarta. Volume 8 No.1 ISSN:2085-1669 e-ISSN : 2460-0288.

Rudi Darrussalam, A.Ranjani, Kusnadi, dan Tinton D.A. (2016). Pengaturan Arah Azimuth Sudut Tilt Panel Potovoltaic Untuk Optimalisasi Radiasi Matahari, Studi Kasus : Bandung-Jawa Barat. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika (E-Journal) SNF 2016 Volume V. p-ISSN: 2339-0654 e-ISSN: 2476-9398, DOI:doi.org/10.21009/0305020606.

Syukarni Ali, T.M. Azis Pandria. (2019) Penentuan Sudut Kemiringan Optimal Panel Surya Untuk Wilayah Meulaboh. Jurnal Mekanova Vol 5. No.1, April 2019. ISSN: 2502-0498.

Dr. Norbert Geuder. Solar Resource Measurements And Satellite Data. 4th Sfera Summer School 2013 Horenber castle, Germany. 2013

Carlos D. Rodríguez-Gallegos, dkk. (2020). Global Techno-Economic Performance of Bifacial and Tracking Photovoltaic Systems, Joule, Volume 4, Issue 7, 2020, Pages 1514-1541, ISSN 2542-4351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.05.005.

https://globalsolaratlas.info/map diakses apada tanggal 14 Desember 2021 Pukul 12.47 WIB

https://ichi.pro/id/mengekstraksi-potensi-tenaga-surya-menggunakan-global-solar-atlas-196057459397182, diakses pada tanggal 14 Desember 2021 Pukul 12.47 WIB.

https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/529431592893043403/pdf/Global-Solar-Atlas-2-0-Technical-Report.pdf

https://www.pvsyst.com/ diakses pada tanggal 2 Desember 2021 Pukul 12.00 WIB.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Gunawan, H., & Sudiarto , B. (2021). Simulasi Perbandingan Perubahan TILT Terhadap Energi Array Pada 34 Unit Plts Rooftop 100 kwp di Indonesia. Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia, 2(1), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.53866/jimi.v2i1.27